Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.
Cartesia Ink 2 is ahead on both datasets together, the Pipecat Dataset and final-text delay, and Smallest Pulse on time to first text. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap. For its voices, see our notes on Cartesia text to speech.
Cartesia Ink 2 is more accurate on both datasets. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.63% and Smallest Pulse 3.59%, so Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors by 0.96 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.39% and Smallest Pulse 3.66%, so Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors by 1.27 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Cartesia Ink 2 is more accurate on both datasets. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.63% and Smallest Pulse 3.59%, so Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors by 0.96 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.39% and Smallest Pulse 3.66%, so Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors by 1.27 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
No. Smallest Pulse finishes the transcript 454ms sooner. Cartesia Ink 2 has the final transcript 1.51s after the speaker stops and Smallest Pulse 1.06s, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
It is a trade-off. Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors on real conversations, while Smallest Pulse finishes the transcript 454ms sooner. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Cartesia Ink 2 shows first text after 3.09% and Smallest Pulse after 3.46%, at the median.
Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.