Deepgram Nova-3 is ahead on the Pipecat Dataset and final-text delay, and Smallest Pulse on the Ocular Dataset. The two tie on time to first text.
Every model's error rate on the public clips, against how long its transcript takes to settle.
Word error rate on 1,000 clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset.
Deepgram Nova-3, 0.19 points lower
Word error rate on eight licensed recordings provided by Ocular.
Smallest Pulse, 0.94 points lower
Median delay before the first words arrive, from the first audio packet.
Level
Median delay after the speaker stops before the transcript is final.
Deepgram Nova-3, 98ms sooner
Lower is better on every metric. The small figure is each model's place in the whole field.
Both measured on the same 206 streamed Ocular Dataset turns. P90 and P95 say what a caller meets on a bad turn, which a median hides.
| Measure | Model | P50 | P90 | P95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first text | Deepgram Nova-3 | 1.06s | 1.10s | 2.07s |
| Smallest Pulse | 1.06s | 2.25s | 3.03s | |
| Final-text delay | Deepgram Nova-3 | 103ms | 143ms | 155ms |
| Smallest Pulse | 201ms | 356ms | 773ms |
Open on the metric where the two sit furthest apart, with the other three a tab away.
Word error rate on eight licensed recordings provided by Ocular. Lower is better.
| # | Model | Ocular Dataset | clips | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reson8 | 2.93% | 8 | |
| 2 | Cartesia Ink 2 | 3.09% | 8 | |
| 3 | Smallest Pulse | 3.46% | 8 | |
| 4 | GPT Realtime Whisper | 3.53% | 8 | |
| 5 | Google Chirp 2 | 3.80% | 8 | |
| 6 | Speechmatics Linden | 3.93% | 8 | |
| 7 | Deepgram Flux English | 4.18% | 8 | |
| 8 | Google Chirp 3 | 4.19% | 8 | |
| 9 | AssemblyAI Universal 3.5 Pro | 4.23% | 8 | |
| 10 | Deepgram Nova-3 | 4.39% | 8 | |
| 11 | Gradium | 4.45% | 8 | |
| 12 | GPT-4o Mini Transcribe | 4.45% | 8 | |
| 13 | Deepgram Flux Multilingual | 4.53% | 8 | |
| 14 | Inworld STT-1 | 10.60% | 8 | |
| 15 | GPT-4o Transcribe | 12.45% | 8 |
Counts are the clips each model returned usable text for, so they differ between models and between datasets.
Every model's error rate on the public clips, against the same model on real conversations.
How soon each model returns its first words, against how soon its transcript is final.
| Model | Pipecat clips | Ocular recordings | Turns timed | Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deepgram Nova-3 | 1,000 | 8 | 202 | 0 |
| Smallest Pulse | 1,000 | 8 | 206 | 0 |
A clip counts only where the model returned usable text, so counts differ between models. Word error rate is measured the same way throughout: incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript.
On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Deepgram Nova-3 scores 3.46% and Smallest Pulse 3.66%, so Deepgram Nova-3 makes fewer errors by 0.19 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Deepgram Nova-3 scores 4.39% and Smallest Pulse 3.46%, so Smallest Pulse makes fewer errors by 0.94 points. The two datasets disagree, so the better choice depends on whether your audio looks more like clean public clips or real conversations.
Both return first text after 1.06s at the median. Deepgram Nova-3 has the final transcript 98ms sooner, 103ms after the speaker stops against 201ms. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Both ran the same two datasets under the same conditions as every other model in the benchmark: 1,000 public clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset and eight licensed conversation recordings from Ocular. Deepgram Nova-3 returned usable text for 1,000 of the public clips and Smallest Pulse for 1,000. Latency uses each provider's own supported finalization contract.