Deepslate Opal vs GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol is more reliable, by 20.0 points. Deepslate Opal handled 9 of 70 real callers well on all three runs, and GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol 23. A caller only counts when every run of the call scored 80 or more.

For a voice agent, GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol, since it handles more real callers well on every run. GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol is ahead of Deepslate Opal on all 11 metrics.

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol, by 23.8 points higher. Deepslate Opal fully resolved 12.4% of calls and GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol 36.2%. A call counts only when every step the caller needed was done.

No. GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol starts replying 0.19s sooner at the median. Deepslate Opal takes 2.46s at the median and 3.16s at p90; GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol takes 2.27s and 2.72s. Both are measured on the call audio, from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply.

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol, by 2.9 points. The agent went quiet for 10 seconds or more on 16.2% of Deepslate Opal calls and 13.3% of GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol calls.

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol is $0.057 cheaper a minute. Deepslate Opal costs $0.112 a minute of call and GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol $0.055, at each vendor's published rates.

Cekura ran both as the whole agent with the same prompt, tools and phone connection. Both took the same 70 recorded real human callers on live calls, three times each. Each call is graded on 25 skills across Hearing, Turn Taking, Task Handling and Speaking, and passes at a score of 80 out of 100.