Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.
Zoom Scribe Pro is ahead of GPT-4o Transcribe on the Pipecat Dataset, the Ocular Dataset and final-text delay.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.
Both providers, every model: OpenAI vs Zoom
Zoom Scribe Pro is more accurate on both datasets. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, GPT-4o Transcribe scores 3.90% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 1.94 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, GPT-4o Transcribe scores 12.45% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 7.61 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Zoom Scribe Pro is more accurate on both datasets. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, GPT-4o Transcribe scores 3.90% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 1.94 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, GPT-4o Transcribe scores 12.45% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 7.61 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
No. Zoom Scribe Pro finishes the transcript 490ms sooner. GPT-4o Transcribe has the final transcript 652ms after the speaker stops and Zoom Scribe Pro 162ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Zoom Scribe Pro is the stronger pick for voice agents: it makes fewer errors on real conversations and finishes the transcript 490ms sooner. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Only Zoom Scribe Pro. GPT-4o Transcribe returns no text until the speaker stops, which matters if your agent reacts to partial transcripts.