Gradium vs Reson8
Gradium is ahead on time to first text and final-text delay, and Reson8 on the Pipecat Dataset and the Ocular Dataset.
Quality and speed frontier
Every model's error rate on the public clips, against how long its transcript takes to settle.
The four metrics, side by side
Word error rate on 1,000 clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset.
- Gradium
- 6.48%15th
- Reson8
- 2.10%3rd
Reson8, 4.38 points lower
Word error rate on eight licensed recordings provided by Ocular.
- Gradium
- 4.45%11th
- Reson8
- 2.93%1st
Reson8, 1.52 points lower
Median delay before the first words arrive, from the first audio packet.
- Gradium
- 1.71s10th
- Reson8
- 2.40s11th
Gradium, 695ms sooner
Median delay after the speaker stops before the transcript is final.
- Gradium
- 212ms9th
- Reson8
- 235ms10th
Gradium, 23ms sooner
Lower is better on every metric. The small figure is each model's place in the whole field.
First text and final text, at three percentiles
Both measured on the same 206 streamed Ocular Dataset turns. P90 and P95 say what a caller meets on a bad turn, which a median hides.
| Measure | Model | P50 | P90 | P95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first text | Gradium | 1.71s | 4.05s | 7.32s |
| Reson8 | 2.40s | 7.97s | 10.20s | |
| Final-text delay | Gradium | 212ms | 266ms | 280ms |
| Reson8 | 235ms | 357ms | 398ms |
Both against every other model
Open on the metric where the two sit furthest apart, with the other three a tab away.
Word error rate on 1,000 clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset. Lower is better.
| # | Model | Pipecat Dataset | clips | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AssemblyAI Universal 3.5 Pro | 1.93% | 1,000 | |
| 2 | Google Chirp 3 | 2.00% | 1,000 | |
| 3 | Reson8 | 2.10% | 1,000 | |
| 4 | GPT Realtime Whisper | 2.16% | 1,000 | |
| 5 | Cartesia Ink 2 | 2.39% | 1,000 | |
| 6 | Speechmatics Linden | 2.46% | 998 | |
| 7 | Google Chirp 2 | 2.59% | 1,000 | |
| 8 | Inworld STT-1 | 2.72% | 1,000 | |
| 9 | GPT-4o Mini Transcribe | 3.35% | 1,000 | |
| 10 | Deepgram Nova-3 | 3.46% | 1,000 | |
| 11 | Smallest Pulse | 3.66% | 1,000 | |
| 12 | GPT-4o Transcribe | 3.90% | 1,000 | |
| 13 | Deepgram Flux English | 3.90% | 999 | |
| 14 | Deepgram Flux Multilingual | 4.96% | 999 | |
| 15 | Gradium | 6.48% | 1,000 |
Counts are the clips each model returned usable text for, so they differ between models and between datasets.
Both on the other two views
Pipecat vs Ocular accuracy
Every model's error rate on the public clips, against the same model on real conversations.
Transcription response time
How soon each model returns its first words, against how soon its transcript is final.
What the numbers rest on
A clip counts only where the model returned usable text, so counts differ between models. Word error rate is measured the same way throughout: incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gradium or Reson8 more accurate?
On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Gradium scores 6.48% and Reson8 2.10%, so Reson8 makes fewer errors by 4.38 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Gradium scores 4.45% and Reson8 2.93%, so Reson8 makes fewer errors by 1.52 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript, so lower is better.
Which is faster, Gradium or Reson8?
Gradium returns first text 695ms sooner, at 1.71s against 2.40s at the median. Gradium has the final transcript 23ms sooner, 212ms after the speaker stops against 235ms. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
How were Gradium and Reson8 compared?
Both ran the same two datasets under the same conditions as every other model in the benchmark: 1,000 public clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset and eight licensed conversation recordings from Ocular. Gradium returned usable text for 1,000 of the public clips and Reson8 for 1,000. Latency uses each provider's own supported finalization contract.