GPT Realtime Whisper is ahead on time to first text, and Reson8 on final-text delay. The Pipecat Dataset and The Ocular Dataset are too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Each dot is one model. Bottom-left is best: fewer errors and a faster final transcript.
Pick GPT Realtime Whisper for showing words while the caller is still talking (1.02s sooner). Pick Reson8 for quick turn-taking once the caller stops (308ms sooner). For accuracy on clean, scripted audio and accuracy on real phone conversations, the gap is inside the margin of error, so neither is ahead.
Too close to call: inside the margin of error
Too close to call: inside the margin of error
GPT Realtime Whisper, 1.02s sooner
Reson8, 308ms sooner
Lower is better on every metric. The small figure is each model's place in the whole field. What each metric measures.
GPT Realtime Whisper shows first text after 2.86s and final text after 669ms, and Reson8 shows first text after 10.20s and final text after 398ms, on a bad turn (P95) across the same streamed turns.
| Measure | Model | P50 | P90 | P95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first text | GPT Realtime Whisper | 1.38s | 1.84s | 2.86s |
| Reson8 | 2.40s | 7.97s | 10.20s | |
| Final-text delay | GPT Realtime Whisper | 543ms | 647ms | 669ms |
| Reson8 | 235ms | 357ms | 398ms |
Place among the 17 models on each metric. Lower is better on all four.
| Metric | Realtime Whisper | Reson8 |
|---|---|---|
| Pipecat Dataset WER | 2.16%5th of 17 | 2.10%4th of 17 |
| Ocular Dataset WER | 3.53%4th of 17 | 2.93%1st of 17 |
| Time to first text | 1.38s10th of 15 | 2.40s13th of 15 |
| Final-text delay | 543ms14th of 17 | 235ms12th of 17 |
| Model | Pipecat clips | Ocular recordings | Turns timed | Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT Realtime Whisper | 1,000 | 8 | 206 | 0 |
| Reson8 | 1,000 | 8 | 201 | 0 |
Only clips with usable text count, so the two totals can differ. How WER is scored.
GPT Realtime Whisper and Reson8 are too close to call on accuracy. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, GPT Realtime Whisper scores 2.16% and Reson8 2.10%, with likely ranges of 1.92 to 2.41% and 1.86 to 2.35%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, GPT Realtime Whisper scores 3.53% and Reson8 2.93%, with likely ranges of 2.58 to 4.51% and 2.29 to 3.68%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
No. Reson8 finishes the transcript 308ms sooner. GPT Realtime Whisper has the final transcript 543ms after the speaker stops and Reson8 235ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Reson8 finishes the transcript 308ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. GPT Realtime Whisper shows first text after 1.38s and Reson8 after 2.40s, at the median, so GPT Realtime Whisper is 1.02s sooner.