First prenatal visit
HealthcareFinished the task
Handled well: Emotion Recognition, Overlapping-Speech Recovery, Human Handoff
Listen to the call1054
ELOELO Rating
4th of 12
32.9%
Pass³Reliability (Pass³)
4th of 12
2.16s
LatencyLatency P50
7th of 12
$0.085
Cost/MinCost per Minute (USD)
7th of 8
Higher wins more head-to-head calls (1000 = average); further left replies faster
Each model took the same recorded human callers on live calls. Pick a measure to see where GPT Realtime 2.1 ranks.
Rating from head-to-head calls: on every call each pair of models is compared, the better call wins. 1000 is the average model. Higher is better.
Pick a skill family. The shape is this model on every skill in it; the dashed line is the median of the other models.
Share of calls where the skill was needed and handled, strongest first. Hover a point on the chart for both values.
Banking and healthcare callers. Each shows what the caller needed, what made the call hard, and how the model handled it.
Finished the task
Handled well: Emotion Recognition, Overlapping-Speech Recovery, Human Handoff
Listen to the callFinished the task
Handled well: Side-Speech Rejection, Tool-Latency Handling, Mid-Utterance Pause Tolerance
Listen to the callFinished the task
Handled well: Degraded-Channel Robustness, Multi-Speaker Handling, Overlapping-Speech Recovery
Struggled with: Numeric Read-back
Listen to the callFinished the task
Handled well: Entity Extraction Accuracy, Degraded-Channel Robustness, Backchannel vs Barge-in Detection
Listen to the callFinished the task
Handled well: Prosodic Cue Understanding, Mid-Utterance Pause Tolerance, Consent Verification
Struggled with: Low-Confidence Confirmation
Listen to the callFinished 3 of 7 steps
Handled well: Waiting Through Hold, Multi-Speaker Handling, Backchannel vs Barge-in Detection
Struggled with: Human Handoff, Consent Verification
Listen to the callFinished 2 of 3 steps
Handled well: Tool-Latency Handling, Consent Verification, Redundant Re-prompt Avoidance
Struggled with: Premature-Response Avoidance
Listen to the callFinished 2 of 6 steps
Handled well: Tool-Latency Handling, Redundant Re-prompt Avoidance, Hallucinated-Success Avoidance
Struggled with: Cancellation Handling
Listen to the callFinished 3 of 6 steps
Handled well: Prosodic Cue Understanding, Consent Verification, Redundant Re-prompt Avoidance
Struggled with: Multi-Speaker Handling, Endpointing, Premature-Response Avoidance
Listen to the callFinished 7 of 8 steps
Handled well: Side-Speech Rejection, Backchannel vs Barge-in Detection, Correction Handling
Struggled with: Low-Confidence Confirmation, Tool Error Handling
Listen to the callGPT Realtime 2.1 starts replying in 2.16s on a typical turn and 2.94s on the slowest turn in twenty, 7th fastest of 12 at the median.
210 live calls: 70 scenarios, each run three times. The median call ran 5:39.
70 scenarios, the same for every model.
GPT Realtime 2.1 has an ELO rating of 1054, 4th of 12 ranked models. It passed 23 of 70 callers on all three runs, a Pass³ of 32.9%.
GPT Realtime 2.1 has an ELO rating of 1054, 4th of 12 ranked models. It passed 23 of 70 callers on all three runs, a Pass³ of 32.9%.
GPT Realtime 2.1 starts replying 2.16s after the caller finishes at P50, 2.70s at P90 and 2.94s at P95: 7th fastest of 12 at P50, measured on the call audio.
GPT Realtime 2.1 falls furthest behind on Pauses and Holds: 62%, against a median of 69%.
GPT Realtime 2.1 has a task completion rate of 34.3%, 3rd of 12. A call counts only when every step the caller needed was done.
$0.085 per minute of call at OpenAI's published rates, 7th cheapest of 8 priced models. Excludes caller transcription, which the service does not meter per call.
Cekura ran GPT Realtime 2.1 as the whole agent with the same prompt, tools and phone connection as every other model. It took the same 70 recorded real human callers on live calls, three times each (210 calls), and each call was graded on 25 skills across Hearing, Turn Taking, Task Handling and Speaking.
Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.