Converse-STT
Inworld

Inworld STT-1

Inworld STT-1 is 1st of 15 on final-text delay and 14th of 15 on the Ocular Dataset.

2.72%
Pipecat WER · 8th
10.60%
Ocular WER · 14th
1.06s
First text · 5th
41ms
Final text · 1st

Quality and speed frontier

Every model's error rate on the public clips, against how long its transcript takes to settle.

Most attractive quadrantPareto line
Final-text delay P50 (ms)
◣ better
Pipecat Dataset WER (%)
The line is the frontier: no model beats these on one measure without giving up the other.
Ranking

Inworld STT-1 against every other model

Open on the metric Inworld STT-1 places highest on, with the other three a tab away. Lower is better on all of them, so the order runs best first.

Final-text delay after the speaker stops. Lower is better.

Median across the same 206 Ocular Dataset turns. Providers finalize differently, so compare models with similar finalization contracts before treating small gaps as meaningful.

Latency

First text and final text, at three percentiles

Measured on the same 206 streamed Ocular Dataset turns as every other model. P90 and P95 say what a caller meets on a bad turn, which a median hides.

MeasureP50P90P95
Time to first text1.06s1.07s1.07s
Final-text delay41ms60ms65ms
Against the field

Inworld STT-1 on the other two views

The same charts the benchmark page carries, with Inworld STT-1 ringed. Consistency across the two datasets is one reading; how fast a model starts against how fast it commits is the other.

Pipecat vs Ocular accuracy

Every model's error rate on the public clips, against the same model on real conversations.

Most attractive quadrant
Ocular Dataset WER (%)
◣ better
Pipecat Dataset WER (%)

Transcription response time

How soon each model returns its first words, against how soon its transcript is final.

Most attractive quadrant
Final-text delay P50 (ms)
◣ better
Time to first text P50 (ms)
Coverage

What the numbers rest on

1,000
Pipecat clips scored
8
Ocular recordings scored
206
turns timed
0
requests that failed

A clip counts only where the model returned usable text, so counts differ between models. Word error rate is measured the same way throughout: incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Where does Inworld STT-1 place in the benchmark?

Inworld STT-1 places highest on final-text delay, 1st of 15 at 41ms. Its weakest placing is the Ocular Dataset, 14th of 15 at 10.60%.

How accurate is Inworld STT-1?

Inworld STT-1 transcribes the 1,000 public Pipecat clips at 2.72% word error rate and the eight licensed Ocular recordings at 10.60%. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript, so lower is better.

How fast is Inworld STT-1 in a live conversation?

First text arrives after 1.06s at the median, and the transcript is final 41ms after the speaker stops. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns as every other model, and the page shows P90 and P95 as well, which is what a caller meets on a bad turn.

How was Inworld STT-1 measured?

Every model runs the same two datasets under the same conditions: 1,000 public clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset for accuracy at scale, and eight licensed conversation recordings from Ocular for real speech. Latency comes from 206 streamed turns, using each provider's own supported finalization contract. Inworld STT-1 returned usable text for 1,000 of the public clips.