Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 vs Inworld STT-1
Accuracy and speed
Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.
- Transcribe Stream 11.90% · 123ms
- STT-12.72% · 41ms
Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 is ahead on both datasets together, the Ocular Dataset and time to first text, and Inworld STT-1 on final-text delay. The Pipecat Dataset is too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Who is better at what
- Overall WER2.21%5.44%
- Pipecat Dataset WER1.90%2.72%
- Ocular Dataset WER2.78%10.60%
- Time to first text730ms1.06s
- Final-text delay123ms41ms
Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap. Our guide explains how word error rate is measured.
Transcribe Stream 1 vs STT-1 FAQ
Which is more accurate, Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 or Inworld STT-1?
Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 scores 2.21% and Inworld STT-1 5.44%, so Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 makes fewer errors by 3.23 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 scores 1.90% and Inworld STT-1 2.72%, with likely ranges of 1.68 to 2.14% and 1.67 to 4.68%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 scores 2.21% and Inworld STT-1 5.44%, so Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 makes fewer errors by 3.23 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 scores 1.90% and Inworld STT-1 2.72%, with likely ranges of 1.68 to 2.14% and 1.67 to 4.68%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Yes. Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 finishes the transcript 333ms sooner. Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 has the final transcript 730ms after the speaker stops and Inworld STT-1 1.06s, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 finishes the transcript 333ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 shows first text after 2.78% and Inworld STT-1 after 10.60%, at the median, so Fish Audio Transcribe Stream 1 is 7.82 points lower.
Test your voice agent the same way.
Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.