Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.
Zoom Scribe Pro is ahead of Gradium on the Pipecat Dataset, time to first text and final-text delay. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.
Zoom Scribe Pro is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Gradium scores 6.48% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 4.52 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Gradium scores 4.45% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, with likely ranges of 3.17 to 5.90% and 4.23 to 5.43%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Zoom Scribe Pro is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Gradium scores 6.48% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 4.52 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Gradium scores 4.45% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, with likely ranges of 3.17 to 5.90% and 4.23 to 5.43%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
No. Zoom Scribe Pro finishes the transcript 50ms sooner. Gradium has the final transcript 212ms after the speaker stops and Zoom Scribe Pro 162ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Zoom Scribe Pro finishes the transcript 50ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Gradium shows first text after 1.71s and Zoom Scribe Pro after 1.70s, at the median, so Zoom Scribe Pro is 6ms sooner.