Gradium vs Reson8 Rumble-2

Compare

Accuracy and speed

Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.

Accurate and fast0ms200ms400ms600ms800ms0%2%4%6%8%Words wrong on clean audio (Pipecat WER)
  • Gradium6.48% · 212ms
  • Rumble-21.69% · 18ms

Reson8 Rumble-2 is ahead of Gradium on both datasets together, the Pipecat Dataset, time to first text and final-text delay. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.

Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam

Who is better at what

GradiumRumble-2
  • Overall WER5.78%2.05%
  • Pipecat Dataset WER6.48%1.69%
  • Ocular Dataset WER4.45%2.75%
  • Time to first text1.71s486ms
  • Final-text delay212ms18ms

Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.

Gradium vs Rumble-2 FAQ

  • Reson8 Rumble-2 is more accurate on both datasets. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Gradium scores 5.78% and Reson8 Rumble-2 2.05%, so Reson8 Rumble-2 makes fewer errors by 3.72 points. On the 300 licensed Ocular turns, Gradium scores 6.48% and Reson8 Rumble-2 1.69%, so Reson8 Rumble-2 makes fewer errors by 4.79 points. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.

  • No. Reson8 Rumble-2 finishes the transcript 1.22s sooner. Gradium has the final transcript 1.71s after the speaker stops and Reson8 Rumble-2 486ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.

  • Reson8 Rumble-2 is the stronger pick for voice agents: it makes fewer errors on real conversations and finishes the transcript 1.22s sooner. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.

  • Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Gradium shows first text after 4.45% and Reson8 Rumble-2 after 2.75%, at the median.

Test your voice agent the same way.

Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.