All comparisons
GradiumOpenAI

Gradium vs GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

Gradium is ahead on final-text delay, and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe on the Pipecat Dataset. The two tie on the Ocular Dataset.

Compare

Quality and speed frontier

Every model's error rate on the public clips, against how long its transcript takes to settle.

Most attractive quadrantPareto line
Final-text delay P50 (ms)
◣ better
Pipecat Dataset WER (%)
The line is the frontier: no model beats these on one measure without giving up the other.
Head to head

The four metrics, side by side

Pipecat Dataset WER

Word error rate on 1,000 clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset.

Gradium
6.48%15th
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
3.35%9th

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe, 3.12 points lower

Ocular Dataset WER

Word error rate on eight licensed recordings provided by Ocular.

Gradium
4.45%11th
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
4.45%11th

Level

Time to first text

Median delay before the first words arrive, from the first audio packet.

Gradium
1.71s10th
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
No text until the speaker stops

Not comparable

Final-text delay

Median delay after the speaker stops before the transcript is final.

Gradium
212ms9th
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
630ms14th

Gradium, 418ms sooner

Lower is better on every metric. The small figure is each model's place in the whole field.

Latency

First text and final text, at three percentiles

Both measured on the same 206 streamed Ocular Dataset turns. P90 and P95 say what a caller meets on a bad turn, which a median hides.

MeasureModelP50P90P95
Time to first textGradium1.71s4.05s7.32s
GPT-4o Mini TranscribeNo text until the speaker stops
Final-text delayGradium212ms266ms280ms
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe630ms1.34s1.53s
Ranking

Both against every other model

Open on the metric where the two sit furthest apart, with the other three a tab away.

Word error rate on 1,000 clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset. Lower is better.

#ModelPipecat Datasetclips
1AssemblyAI Universal 3.5 Pro1.93%1,000
2Google Chirp 32.00%1,000
3Reson82.10%1,000
4GPT Realtime Whisper2.16%1,000
5Cartesia Ink 22.39%1,000
6Speechmatics Linden2.46%998
7Google Chirp 22.59%1,000
8Inworld STT-12.72%1,000
9GPT-4o Mini Transcribe3.35%1,000
10Deepgram Nova-33.46%1,000
11Smallest Pulse3.66%1,000
12GPT-4o Transcribe3.90%1,000
13Deepgram Flux English3.90%999
14Deepgram Flux Multilingual4.96%999
15Gradium6.48%1,000

Counts are the clips each model returned usable text for, so they differ between models and between datasets.

Against the field

Both on the other two views

Pipecat vs Ocular accuracy

Every model's error rate on the public clips, against the same model on real conversations.

Most attractive quadrant
Ocular Dataset WER (%)
◣ better
Pipecat Dataset WER (%)

Transcription response time

How soon each model returns its first words, against how soon its transcript is final.

Most attractive quadrant
Final-text delay P50 (ms)
◣ better
Time to first text P50 (ms)
Coverage

What the numbers rest on

ModelPipecat clipsOcular recordingsTurns timedFailed
Gradium1,00081980
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe1,00082060

A clip counts only where the model returned usable text, so counts differ between models. Word error rate is measured the same way throughout: incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Is Gradium or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe more accurate?

On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Gradium scores 6.48% and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe 3.35%, so GPT-4o Mini Transcribe makes fewer errors by 3.12 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Gradium scores 4.45% and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe 4.45%, which is a tie. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words against the reference transcript, so lower is better.

Which is faster, Gradium or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe?

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe returns no text while the speaker is talking, so time to first text cannot be compared. Gradium has the final transcript 418ms sooner, 212ms after the speaker stops against 630ms. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.

How were Gradium and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe compared?

Both ran the same two datasets under the same conditions as every other model in the benchmark: 1,000 public clips from Pipecat's STT benchmark dataset and eight licensed conversation recordings from Ocular. Gradium returned usable text for 1,000 of the public clips and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe for 1,000. Latency uses each provider's own supported finalization contract.