Deepgram Nova-3vsZoom Scribe Pro

Compare

Accuracy and speed

Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.

Accurate and fast0ms200ms400ms600ms800ms0%2%4%6%8%Words wrong on clean audio (Pipecat WER)
  • Nova-33.46% · 103ms
  • Scribe Pro1.96% · 162ms

Deepgram Nova-3 is ahead on time to first text and final-text delay, and Zoom Scribe Pro on the Pipecat Dataset. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.

Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam

Who is better at what

Nova-3Scribe Pro
  • Pipecat Dataset WER3.46%1.96%
  • Ocular Dataset WER4.39%4.84%
  • Time to first text1.06s1.70s
  • Final-text delay103ms162ms

Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.

Nova-3 vs Scribe Pro FAQ

  • Zoom Scribe Pro is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Deepgram Nova-3 scores 3.46% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, so Zoom Scribe Pro makes fewer errors by 1.50 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Deepgram Nova-3 scores 4.39% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, with likely ranges of 3.42 to 5.25% and 4.23 to 5.43%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.

  • Yes. Deepgram Nova-3 finishes the transcript 59ms sooner. Deepgram Nova-3 has the final transcript 103ms after the speaker stops and Zoom Scribe Pro 162ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.

  • Deepgram Nova-3 finishes the transcript 59ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.

  • Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Deepgram Nova-3 shows first text after 1.06s and Zoom Scribe Pro after 1.70s, at the median, so Deepgram Nova-3 is 635ms sooner.