Cartesia Ink 2 vs Reson8

Compare

Accuracy and speed

Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.

Accurate and fast0ms200ms400ms600ms800ms0%2%4%6%8%Words wrong on clean audio (Pipecat WER)
  • Ink 22.39% · 123ms
  • Reson82.10% · 235ms

Cartesia Ink 2 is ahead on time to first text and final-text delay, and Reson8 on both datasets together. The Pipecat Dataset and The Ocular Dataset are too close to call.

Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam

Who is better at what

Ink 2Reson8
  • Overall WER2.63%2.38%
  • Pipecat Dataset WER2.39%2.10%
  • Ocular Dataset WER3.09%2.93%
  • Time to first text1.51s2.40s
  • Final-text delay123ms235ms

Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap. For its voices, see our notes on Cartesia text to speech.

Ink 2 vs Reson8 FAQ

  • Reson8 is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.63% and Reson8 2.38%, so Reson8 makes fewer errors by 0.24 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.39% and Reson8 2.10%, with likely ranges of 2.13 to 2.65% and 1.86 to 2.35%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.

  • Yes. Cartesia Ink 2 finishes the transcript 889ms sooner. Cartesia Ink 2 has the final transcript 1.51s after the speaker stops and Reson8 2.40s, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.

  • Cartesia Ink 2 finishes the transcript 889ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.

  • Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Cartesia Ink 2 shows first text after 3.09% and Reson8 after 2.93%, at the median.

Test your voice agent the same way.

Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.