Cartesia Ink 2vsDeepgram Flux English

Compare

Accuracy and speed

Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.

Accurate and fast0ms200ms400ms600ms800ms0%2%4%6%8%Words wrong on clean audio (Pipecat WER)
  • Ink 22.39% · 123ms
  • Flux English3.90% · 108ms

Deepgram Flux English is ahead on time to first text and final-text delay, and Cartesia Ink 2 on the Pipecat Dataset. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.

Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam

Who is better at what

Ink 2Flux English
  • Pipecat Dataset WER2.39%3.90%
  • Ocular Dataset WER3.09%4.18%
  • Time to first text1.51s791ms
  • Final-text delay123ms108ms

Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.

Ink 2 vs Flux English FAQ

  • Cartesia Ink 2 is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 2.39% and Deepgram Flux English 3.90%, so Cartesia Ink 2 makes fewer errors by 1.52 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Cartesia Ink 2 scores 3.09% and Deepgram Flux English 4.18%, with likely ranges of 2.43 to 3.84% and 3.08 to 5.23%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.

  • No. Deepgram Flux English finishes the transcript 15ms sooner. Cartesia Ink 2 has the final transcript 123ms after the speaker stops and Deepgram Flux English 108ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.

  • Deepgram Flux English finishes the transcript 15ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.

  • Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Cartesia Ink 2 shows first text after 1.51s and Deepgram Flux English after 791ms, at the median, so Deepgram Flux English is 720ms sooner.