Amazon Nova 2 Sonic
- Best voice score of the field.
- Model
- amazon.nova-2-sonic-v1:0
- Setting
- Endpointing medium
- Voice
- matthew
- Turn taking
- Shared local turn detection
- Audio
- 16 kHz
- Cost
- The vendor's rates for this model are not yet verified.
Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash is ahead on reliability, success rate, agent responses, data accuracy, stalled calls and response time, and Amazon Nova 2 Sonic on interruption.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Pick Amazon Nova 2 Sonic for handling interruptions (0.03 higher). Pick Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash for reliability across repeated calls (32.9 points higher), calls that pass every check (33.7 points higher), getting the agent's replies right (5.3 points higher), saving the caller's data correctly (34.2 points higher), fewer stalled calls (0.4 points lower) and fast replies (0.01s sooner).
Scenarios that passed on all three runs.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 32.9 points higher
Calls that passed every check.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 33.7 points higher
Calls where the agent's replies reached the expected outcome.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 5.3 points higher
Calls where everything the agent saved matched exactly.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 34.2 points higher
Calls where the agent went silent for 10 seconds or more.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 0.4 points lower
How well it handled being talked over, 0 to 5.
Nova 2 Sonic, 0.03 higher
Median time to start replying after the caller finishes.
Cascade, GPT-4.1, 0.01s sooner
One minute of call at the vendor's published rates.
Not comparable
The small figure is the place among ranked models. The cascade is not ranked.
Cascade, GPT-4.1 2.17s, Nova 2 Sonic 2.18s at the median.
Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash is more reliable, by 32.9 points. Amazon Nova 2 Sonic passed 41 of 82 scenarios on all three runs, and Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash passed 68. A scenario only counts when every run of it passed.
On reliability, no: the Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash cascade passes more scenarios on every run. Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash is ahead on reliability, success rate, agent responses, data accuracy, stalled calls and response time, and Amazon Nova 2 Sonic on interruption. Both ran as the same agent, with the same prompt and tools.
Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash, by 34.2 points. Amazon Nova 2 Sonic saved everything exactly right on 59.9% of the calls that save data, and Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash on 94.1%. On Appointments, 82.5% against 98.8%. On Medicare, 1.5% against 81.8%. A call counts only when nothing is missing, wrong, extra or saved twice.
No. Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash starts replying 0.01s sooner at the median. Amazon Nova 2 Sonic takes 2.18s at the median and 2.76s at p90; Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash takes 2.17s and 2.51s. Both are measured on the call audio, from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply.
Amazon Nova 2 Sonic, by 0.03 on a 0 to 5 scale. Amazon Nova 2 Sonic scores 4.99 and Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash 4.96 for how well the agent handled being talked over.
Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash, by 0.4 points. The agent went silent for 10 seconds or more on 1.2% of Amazon Nova 2 Sonic calls and 0.8% of Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash calls.
There is no verified per-minute rate for Amazon Nova 2 Sonic and Flux → GPT-4.1 → ElevenLabs Flash, so cost cannot be compared yet.
Cekura ran both as the whole agent in the same open-source Pipecat pipeline, with the same prompt, tools and connection. A simulated caller worked through all 82 scenarios on live calls, three times each, 2,952 calls across the benchmark. A call passes only when the agent said the right things and saved the right data. The cascade runs the same agent for reference and is never ranked.