Smallest AI is ahead on infrastructure reliability, tool call accuracy, voice tone and clarity, interruption handling and response time, and Vapi on repeatable reliability and task completion.

Smallest AI ranked 9 of 10 · Vapi ranked 8 of 10

Last updated Methodology by Luis Ojeda

Which to pick

Pick Smallest AI for calls that connect and stay up (13.41 points higher), accurate tool calls (0.56 higher), how the agent sounds (0.29 higher), handling interruptions (0.18 higher) and fast replies (0.37s faster). Pick Vapi for reliability across repeated runs (3.66 points higher) and completing the caller's task (3.25 points higher).

Every metric, side by side

Bars share one scale across all 10 platforms. The place next to each figure is its rank in the field.

Repeatable reliability

Share of the 82 scenarios that passed on all three runs.

Smallest AI
56.10%9th
Vapi
59.76%8th

Vapi, 3.66 points higher

Task completion

Calls where the expected outcome was fully reached.

Smallest AI
94.31%5th
Vapi
97.56%2nd

Vapi, 3.25 points higher

Infrastructure-clean calls

Calls with no connection, audio or platform failure.

Smallest AI
96.34%7th
Vapi
82.93%9th

Smallest AI, 13.41 points higher

Tool call accuracy

Mean score for calling the right tool with the right arguments.

Smallest AI
4.58/56th
Vapi
4.02/510th

Smallest AI, 0.56 higher

Voice tone and clarity

Mean score for how clear and natural the agent sounds.

Smallest AI
4.37/52nd
Vapi
4.08/57th

Smallest AI, 0.29 higher

Interruption handling

Mean score for yielding and recovering when the caller cuts in.

Smallest AI
4.91/58th
Vapi
4.73/59th

Smallest AI, 0.18 higher

Mean response time

Mean time for the agent to start replying after the caller stops.

Smallest AI
2.71s8th
Vapi
3.08s10th

Smallest AI, 0.37s faster

246 calls per platform: 82 scenarios, 3 runs each.

What each platform ran, and what we saw

Smallest AI

Strength
94.31% task completion across all 246 calls, and 62.71% pass³ on the Appointment suite (37 of 59 scenarios).
What can be improved
Atoms tool parameters cannot be arrays, so Medicare list arguments arrive as comma-separated text; its tool accuracy reads that text as a list. With the standard check it scores 45.12% pass³.
STT, LLM and TTS
  • pulse
  • electron
  • waves_lightning_v3_1_pro (chelsea)

Vapi

Strength
Tied for second in task completion at 97.56% across 205 calls with outcome evidence.
What can be improved
The remaining 41 of 246 calls did not connect and remain visible in infrastructure reliability.
STT, LLM and TTS
  • stt-rt-v5
  • gpt-4.1-2025-04-14
  • vapi-v2 (Clara)

Smallest AI vs Vapi FAQ

  • Vapi is more reliable, by 3.66 points. Smallest AI passed 56.10% of the 82 scenarios on all 3 runs and Vapi passed 59.76%. A scenario only counts when every run of it passed.

  • Smallest AI starts replying sooner, 0.37s faster. Mean response time is 2.71s for Smallest AI and 3.08s for Vapi.

  • Smallest AI reached the expected outcome on 94.31% of calls and Vapi on 97.56%. Vapi is ahead on task completion.

  • Both ran the same Appointment and Medicare agents through the same 82 caller scenarios, 3 times each, with the same evaluators and mock tools. Only the platform and its speech and model components changed.

Test your voice agent the same way.

Cekura runs these simulated calls on your agent and scores every one.