Inworld STT-1vsZoom Scribe Pro
Accuracy and speed
Left gets fewer words wrong. Lower has the final text ready sooner.
- STT-12.72% · 41ms
- Scribe Pro1.96% · 162ms
Inworld STT-1 is ahead of Zoom Scribe Pro on time to first text and final-text delay. The Pipecat Dataset and The Ocular Dataset are too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Who is better at what
- Pipecat Dataset WER2.72%1.96%
- Ocular Dataset WER10.60%4.84%
- Time to first text1.06s1.70s
- Final-text delay41ms162ms
Lower is better on every measure. Too close to call means the likely ranges overlap.
STT-1 vs Scribe Pro FAQ
Which is more accurate, Inworld STT-1 or Zoom Scribe Pro?
Inworld STT-1 and Zoom Scribe Pro are too close to call on accuracy. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Inworld STT-1 scores 2.72% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, with likely ranges of 1.67 to 4.68% and 1.73 to 2.20%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Inworld STT-1 scores 10.60% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, with likely ranges of 3.85 to 22.76% and 4.23 to 5.43%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Inworld STT-1 and Zoom Scribe Pro are too close to call on accuracy. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, Inworld STT-1 scores 2.72% and Zoom Scribe Pro 1.96%, with likely ranges of 1.67 to 4.68% and 1.73 to 2.20%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, Inworld STT-1 scores 10.60% and Zoom Scribe Pro 4.84%, with likely ranges of 3.85 to 22.76% and 4.23 to 5.43%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Yes. Inworld STT-1 finishes the transcript 121ms sooner. Inworld STT-1 has the final transcript 41ms after the speaker stops and Zoom Scribe Pro 162ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
Inworld STT-1 finishes the transcript 121ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Yes, both return partial text before the speaker stops. Inworld STT-1 shows first text after 1.06s and Zoom Scribe Pro after 1.70s, at the median, so Inworld STT-1 is 636ms sooner.