AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro is ahead of GPT-4o Mini Transcribe on the Pipecat Dataset and final-text delay. The Ocular Dataset is too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Each dot is one model. Bottom-left is best: fewer errors and a faster final transcript.
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro is the better pick over GPT-4o Mini Transcribe on every measure that separates them: accuracy on clean, scripted audio (1.58 points lower) and quick turn-taking once the caller stops (539ms sooner). For accuracy on real phone conversations, the gap is inside the margin of error, so neither is ahead.
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro, 1.58 points lower
Too close to call: inside the margin of error
Not comparable
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro, 539ms sooner
Lower is better on every metric. The small figure is each model's place in the whole field. What each metric measures.
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro shows first text after 967ms and final text after 232ms, and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe shows first text after 40.84s and final text after 1.53s, on a bad turn (P95) across the same streamed turns.
| Measure | Model | P50 | P90 | P95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first text | AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro | 485ms | 966ms | 967ms |
| GPT-4o Mini Transcribe | No text until the speaker stops | |||
| Final-text delay | AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro | 91ms | 210ms | 232ms |
| GPT-4o Mini Transcribe | 630ms | 1.34s | 1.53s | |
Place among the 17 models on each metric. Lower is better on all four.
| Metric | Universal 3.6 Pro | 4o Mini Transcribe |
|---|---|---|
| Pipecat Dataset WER | 1.77%1st of 17 | 3.35%11th of 17 |
| Ocular Dataset WER | 4.50%14th of 17 | 4.45%12th of 17 |
| Time to first text | 485ms1st of 15 | Not comparable |
| Final-text delay | 91ms3rd of 17 | 630ms16th of 17 |
| Model | Pipecat clips | Ocular recordings | Turns timed | Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro | 1,000 | 8 | 206 | 0 |
| GPT-4o Mini Transcribe | 1,000 | 8 | 206 | 0 |
Only clips with usable text count, so the two totals can differ. How WER is scored.
Both providers, every model: AssemblyAI vs OpenAI
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro is more accurate on the public clips. On the 1,000 public Pipecat clips, AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro scores 1.77% and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe 3.35%, so AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro makes fewer errors by 1.58 points. On the eight licensed Ocular recordings, AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro scores 4.50% and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe 4.45%, with likely ranges of 3.66 to 5.34% and 3.22 to 5.55%. The ranges overlap, so the difference is too close to call. Word error rate counts incorrect, missing, and extra words, so lower is better.
Yes. AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro finishes the transcript 539ms sooner. AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro has the final transcript 91ms after the speaker stops and GPT-4o Mini Transcribe 630ms, at the median. Both are measured on the same 206 streamed turns.
AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro finishes the transcript 539ms sooner, and the two are too close to call on real conversations. A voice agent cannot reply until the final transcript arrives, and the Ocular recordings are real conversations.
Only AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro. GPT-4o Mini Transcribe returns no text until the speaker stops, which matters if your agent reacts to partial transcripts.