CekuraBench
All comparisons
OpenAIOpenAI

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) vs GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) is ahead on reliability, success rate, agent responses, data accuracy and response time, and GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini on stalled calls, interruption and cost.

Compare

Success rate by suite

Appointments59 scenariosMedicare23 scenarios
  • GPT Realtime 2.1OpenAI
    92%
    81%
  • GPT-Live 1 + Sol lowOpenAI
    97%
    49%
  • Gemini 3.8 Live ThinkingGoogle
    82%
    61%
  • Grok Think Fast 2.0xAI
    96%
    25%
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash LiveGoogle
    93%
    32%
  • Phonic v1Phonic
    97%
    14%
  • Realtime 2.1 MiniOpenAI
    84%
    4%
  • Nova 2 SonicAmazon
    80%
    6%
  • Cascade, GPT-4.1Not ranked
    97%
    83%
Each model's share of calls that passed every check, on each suite.

Every metric, side by side

Reliability

Scenarios that passed on all three runs.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
75.6%2nd
Realtime 2.1 Mini
50.0%7th

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low, 25.6 points higher

Success rate

Calls that passed every check.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
83.7%2nd
Realtime 2.1 Mini
61.4%7th

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low, 22.4 points higher

Agent responses

Calls where the agent's replies reached the expected outcome.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
100.0%1st
Realtime 2.1 Mini
93.5%8th

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low, 6.5 points higher

Data accuracy

Calls where everything the agent saved matched exactly.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
89.0%2nd
Realtime 2.1 Mini
64.5%7th

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low, 24.5 points higher

Stalled calls

Calls where the agent went silent for 10 seconds or more.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
12.2%8th
Realtime 2.1 Mini
2.5%3rd

Realtime 2.1 Mini, 9.7 points lower

Interruption

How well it handled being talked over, 0 to 5.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
4.897th
Realtime 2.1 Mini
4.992nd

Realtime 2.1 Mini, 0.10 higher

Response time

Median time to start replying after the caller finishes.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
2.02s4th
Realtime 2.1 Mini
2.08s5th

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low, 0.06s sooner

Cost / min

One minute of call at the vendor's published rates.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low
$0.0552nd
Realtime 2.1 Mini
$0.0201st

Realtime 2.1 Mini, $0.035 cheaper

The small figure is the place among ranked models. The cascade is not ranked.

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low answers first

GPT-Live 1 + Sol low 2.02s, Realtime 2.1 Mini 2.08s at the median.

Response time, median to p90

MedianTo p90
Medianp90
  • Phonic v1Phonic
    Phonic v1: median 1.59s, p90 1.86s
    1.59s1.86s
  • Grok Think Fast 2.0xAI
    Grok Think Fast 2.0: median 1.62s, p90 1.94s
    1.62s1.94s
  • GPT Realtime 2.1OpenAI
    GPT Realtime 2.1: median 1.94s, p90 2.46s
    1.94s2.46s
  • GPT-Live 1 + Sol lowOpenAI
    GPT-Live 1 + Sol low: median 2.02s, p90 2.42s
    2.02s2.42s
  • Realtime 2.1 MiniOpenAI
    Realtime 2.1 Mini: median 2.08s, p90 2.75s
    2.08s2.75s
  • Nova 2 SonicAmazon
    Nova 2 Sonic: median 2.18s, p90 2.76s
    2.18s2.76s
  • Gemini 3.8 Live ThinkingGoogle
    Gemini 3.8 Live Thinking: median 2.32s, p90 3.06s
    2.32s3.06s
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash LiveGoogle
    Gemini 3.1 Flash Live: median 2.88s, p90 4.00s
    2.88s4.00s
  • Cascade, GPT-4.1Not ranked
    Cascade, GPT-4.1: median 2.17s, p90 2.51s
    2.17s2.51s
2.0s3.0s4.0s
Seconds from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply, per model.

What we saw on the calls

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking)

  • Near perfect on the short form, run after run.
  • Every failure is in the saved record; the conversation itself always reaches the outcome.
  • On the long form it routes the caller wrong or skips a step.
  • Says goodbye without hanging up, and stalls more than any other model.
  • Lowest voice score of the field.
Model
gpt-live-1
Setting
Delegates reasoning and tools to Sol
Voice
marin
Turn taking
Service turn detection
Audio
24 kHz
Cost
Includes the delegated backend model.

GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini

  • Gets most short-form calls right, at a fraction of the cost.
  • Sometimes mishears a phone number.
  • Drops details given earlier: not one long-form record was exact.
  • Rarely recovers when a tool returns an error.
Model
gpt-realtime-2.1-mini
Setting
Reasoning high
Voice
marin
Turn taking
Service turn detection
Audio
24 kHz
Cost
Averaged over the calls with a usage record.
See the full leaderboardReference agent

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) or GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini more reliable?

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) passed 62 of 82 scenarios on all three runs, and GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini passed 41. GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) is ahead, by 25.6 points.

Which saves caller data more accurately, GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) or GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini?

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) saved everything exactly right on 89.0% of the calls that save data, and GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini on 64.5%. On Appointments, 100.0% against 88.8%. On Medicare, 60.6% against 0.0%. A call counts only when nothing is missing, wrong, extra or saved twice.

Which responds faster, GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) or GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini?

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) starts replying 0.06s sooner at the median. GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) takes 2.02s at the median and 2.42s at p90; GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini takes 2.08s and 2.75s. Both are measured on the call audio, from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply.

Which costs less, GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) or GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini?

GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) costs $0.055 a minute of call and GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini $0.020, at each vendor's published rates. GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini is $0.035 cheaper a minute.

How were GPT-Live 1 + GPT-6 Sol (low thinking) and GPT Realtime 2.1 Mini compared?

Both ran as the whole agent in the same open-source Pipecat pipeline, with the same prompt, tools and phone line. A simulated caller worked through all 82 scenarios on live calls, three times each, 2,214 calls across the benchmark. A call passes only when the agent said the right things and saved the right data.