All comparisons
DeepslateGoogle

Deepslate Opal vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview is ahead on reliability, success rate, data accuracy, stalled calls, interruption and cost, and Deepslate Opal on response time. The two tie on agent responses.

Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam

Compare

Success rate by suite

Higher is better
Appointments59 scenariosMedicare23 scenarios
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash LiveGoogle
    93%
    32%
  • Deepslate OpalDeepslate
    84%
    35%
Each model's share of calls that passed every check, on each suite.
Verdict

Which to pick

Pick Deepslate Opal for fast replies (0.61s sooner). Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview for reliability across repeated calls (4.9 points higher), calls that pass every check (6.1 points higher), saving the caller's data correctly (6.7 points higher), fewer stalled calls (2.0 points lower), handling interruptions (0.02 higher) and lower cost ($0.042 cheaper). They are level on getting the agent's replies right.

Every metric, side by side

Reliability

Scenarios that passed on all three runs.

Deepslate Opal
57.3%7th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
62.2%6th

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, 4.9 points higher

Success rate

Calls that passed every check.

Deepslate Opal
69.9%8th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
76.0%5th

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, 6.1 points higher

Agent responses

Calls where the agent's replies reached the expected outcome.

Deepslate Opal
95.9%6th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
95.9%6th

Level

Data accuracy

Calls where everything the agent saved matched exactly.

Deepslate Opal
72.6%8th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
79.2%5th

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, 6.7 points higher

Stalled calls

Calls where the agent went silent for 10 seconds or more.

Deepslate Opal
5.3%9th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
3.3%6th

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, 2.0 points lower

Interruption

How well it handled being talked over, 0 to 5.

Deepslate Opal
4.967th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
4.985th

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, 0.02 higher

Response time

Median time to start replying after the caller finishes.

Deepslate Opal
2.27s10th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
2.88s11th

Deepslate Opal, 0.61s sooner

Cost / min

One minute of call at the vendor's published rates.

Deepslate Opal
$0.1127th
Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
$0.0703rd

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, $0.042 cheaper

The small figure is the place among ranked models. The cascade is not ranked.

Deepslate Opal answers first

Deepslate Opal 2.27s, Gemini 3.1 Flash Live 2.88s at the median.

Response time, median to p90

Lower is betterMedianTo p90
Medianp90
  • Deepslate OpalDeepslate
    Deepslate Opal: median 2.27s, p90 2.83s
    2.27s2.83s
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash LiveGoogle
    Gemini 3.1 Flash Live: median 2.88s, p90 4.00s
    2.88s4.00s
2.0s3.0s4.0s
Seconds from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply, per model.

What we saw on the calls

Deepslate Opal

  • Every interrupted call and every call with several requests passed.
All 3 notes on Deepslate Opal
Model
opal
Setting
No reasoning setting
Voice
ElevenLabs 21m00Tcm4TlvDq8ikWAM
Turn taking
Service turn detection
Audio
16 kHz
Cost
The vendor's regular rate of €0.10 a minute, at the ECB rate of 5 Oct 2026, applied to each call's length; its launch offer is €0.02. Excludes the ElevenLabs voice, billed on the customer's own ElevenLabs key.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

  • Reliable on bookings.
All 3 notes on Gemini 3.1 Flash Live
Model
models/gemini-3.1-flash-live-preview
Setting
Thinking level high
Voice
Charon
Turn taking
Shared local turn detection
Audio
16 kHz
Cost
Averaged over the calls with a usage record.

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview more reliable?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview is more reliable, by 4.9 points. Deepslate Opal passed 47 of 82 scenarios on all three runs, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview passed 51. A scenario only counts when every run of it passed.

Which should I pick, Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

For a phone agent, Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview, since it gets more scenarios right on every run. Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview is ahead on reliability, success rate, data accuracy, stalled calls, interruption and cost, and Deepslate Opal on response time. The two tie on agent responses.

Which saves caller data more accurately, Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview, by 6.7 points. Deepslate Opal saved everything exactly right on 72.6% of the calls that save data, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview on 79.2%. On Appointments, 85.4% against 96.5%. On Medicare, 39.4% against 34.8%. A call counts only when nothing is missing, wrong, extra or saved twice.

Is Deepslate Opal faster than Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Yes. Deepslate Opal starts replying 0.61s sooner at the median. Deepslate Opal takes 2.27s at the median and 2.83s at p90; Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview takes 2.88s and 4.00s. Both are measured on the call audio, from the caller finishing to the agent starting to reply.

Which handles interruptions better, Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview, by 0.02 on a 0 to 5 scale. Deepslate Opal scores 4.96 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview 4.98 for how well the agent handled being talked over.

Which goes silent on callers less often, Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview, by 2.0 points. The agent went silent for 10 seconds or more on 5.3% of Deepslate Opal calls and 3.3% of Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview calls.

Which is cheaper, Deepslate Opal or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview is $0.042 cheaper a minute. Deepslate Opal costs $0.112 a minute of call and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview $0.070, at each vendor's published rates.

Where does the Deepslate Opal vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview data come from?

Cekura ran both as the whole agent in the same open-source Pipecat pipeline, with the same prompt, tools and connection. A simulated caller worked through all 82 scenarios on live calls, three times each, 2,952 calls across the benchmark. A call passes only when the agent said the right things and saved the right data.