GooglevsZoom
Zoom is ahead of Google on time to first text and final-text delay. The Pipecat Dataset and The Ocular Dataset are too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Who is better at what
Each row sets Google's best model against Zoom's best on that measure.
- Pipecat Dataset WER2.00%Google Chirp 31.96%Zoom Scribe Pro
- Ocular Dataset WER3.80%Google Chirp 24.84%Zoom Scribe Pro
- Time to first text4.48sGoogle Chirp 31.67sZoom Scribe
- Final-text delay475msGoogle Chirp 3118msZoom Scribe
Google vs Zoom FAQ
Is Google or Zoom better for speech-to-text?
It is too close to call: the gap is inside the margin of error. The best Google result is Google Chirp 3 at 2.00%, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe Pro at 1.96%, on the Pipecat Dataset.
It is too close to call: the gap is inside the margin of error. The best Google result is Google Chirp 3 at 2.00%, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe Pro at 1.96%, on the Pipecat Dataset.
Zoom is faster, 357ms sooner. The best Google result is Google Chirp 3 at 475ms, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe at 118ms, on final-text delay.
Google: Google Chirp 2, Google Chirp 3. Zoom: Zoom Scribe, Zoom Scribe Pro. Every model ran the same tests on Converse-STT.