AssemblyAIvsZoom
AssemblyAI is ahead of Zoom on time to first text and final-text delay. The Pipecat Dataset and The Ocular Dataset are too close to call.
Last updated Methodology by Dileep Chagam
Who is better at what
Each row sets AssemblyAI's best model against Zoom's best on that measure.
- Pipecat Dataset WER1.77%AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro1.96%Zoom Scribe Pro
- Ocular Dataset WER4.23%AssemblyAI Universal 3.5 Pro4.84%Zoom Scribe Pro
- Time to first text485msAssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro1.67sZoom Scribe
- Final-text delay91msAssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro118msZoom Scribe
AssemblyAI vs Zoom FAQ
Is AssemblyAI or Zoom better for speech-to-text?
It is too close to call: the gap is inside the margin of error. The best AssemblyAI result is AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro at 1.77%, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe Pro at 1.96%, on the Pipecat Dataset.
It is too close to call: the gap is inside the margin of error. The best AssemblyAI result is AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro at 1.77%, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe Pro at 1.96%, on the Pipecat Dataset.
AssemblyAI is faster, 27ms sooner. The best AssemblyAI result is AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro at 91ms, and the best Zoom result is Zoom Scribe at 118ms, on final-text delay.
AssemblyAI: AssemblyAI Universal 3.5 Pro, AssemblyAI Universal 3.6 Pro. Zoom: Zoom Scribe, Zoom Scribe Pro. Every model ran the same tests on Converse-STT.